Software Finance
Experts analyze a variety of investment and funding options for today's software vendors.
POSTS IN THIS
BLOG TOPIC
- 2007 Software VC & M&A Wrap-Up
by Maryann Jones Thompson - Yours, Mine and Ours: What to Disclose and What to Keep Private During Divestiture
by Helene Abrams, eprentise - Downturn
by Guy Smith - How to Reduce G&A Expenses
by Lauren J. Kelley - U.S. Software IPO Update
by Ken Bender - Private Equity Monies Move Into Services Marketplace
by Jeffrey M. Kaplan - Q1 Software M&A and VC Update
by Maryann Jones Thompson - A Summary of 2006 Software Industry Equity Trends
by Ken Bender - Follow the Money - Venture Trends for Q2 2006
by Jonathan Klein - How Will Tomorrow's Tech Company Builders Raise Capital?
by Phil Bookman - The Three Curses of Internet Success
by Phil Bookman - Double-Take Software Files for an IPO
by Tom Taulli - Bootstrap Your Business for Growth - and Growth Will Happen
by James Quist
How to Reduce G&A Expenses
Lauren J. Kelley
Dec. 17, 2007
As the calendar year comes to a close, we thought this was a good time to take a closer look at G&A expenses. All companies would like to reduce G&A expenses, but it is particularly challenging for mid-sized software firms. Companies in the middle market need to meet basic services, continue to invest in growth, account for increasing regulatory and legal requirements, and all without the economies of scale of very large companies. In our analysis of 1H '07 G&A expenses as a % of revenue for 11 mid-sized software companies, we see a range of 11.6% to 19.9% with the majority of companies falling between 14.5 to16%. See the full data at: www.opexengine.com/services/softwarereports.html
Efficient G&A and overhead spending is essential for attaining and maintaining profitability. In our discussions with CFOs of mid-sized software companies, the underlying issue with managing G&A expense tends to be the difficulty in making the appropriate overhead investments early. It is critical to establish early in the company's lifecycle the right processes for sustaining growth, entering the public markets and then meeting all the regulatory and financial requirements that are associated with being a public company. Many early stage CEOs would prefer to put their investment dollars into sales, marketing or R&D, rather than putting in place the processes and financial personnel necessary to meet public company requirements. That is, until a crisis looms and the cost of catching up is much higher. An emergency audit or, in the worst case, having to restate earnings, is far more costly than incrementally paying for good financial accounting and reporting along the way.
Companies that swing between high G&A spending (often the result of a "problem") and then major cuts in expenses often have trouble meeting profitability targets. By contrast, steady state overhead spending with a gradual lowering of the G&A-to revenue ratio, as revenues grow, will generate higher profitability and consequently, higher market capitalizations. For more detail on the 1H 2007 G&A expense ratios for mid-sized and SaaS software companies, see www.opexengine.com/services/softwarereports.html .
Where to Trim the Fat
Beyond planning and implementing the appropriate processes for strategic growth, most companies look to squeeze any fat out of G&A services this time of year. Recommendations for quick hit expense savings, according to an ad hoc survey of software CFOs include:
- telecomm contracts (plenty of consultants will review and reduce your telecomm charges and pay for their services out of your savings);
- travel - limiting travel across the board as well as revising regular policies for more efficiencies;
- cutting sponsorships and/or retainer fees: some relationships have changed over time but may not be reviewed regularly to ensure that current goals are being met;
- printing and office supply costs;
- medical benefits;
- outsourcing of IT can be very cost effective and even provide better service for companies with up to 500 employees;
- outsourcing of various finance functions, such as A/P if those functions can be handled externally.
Estimates range between 3-5% savings from these areas with further savings from successful outsourcing of IT and/or finance functions.
In OPEXEngine's confidential benchmarking survey of 20 mid-size software companies, we found travel expense averaged 4.4% b>of revenue (with median revenues of about $80M). Facilities expense ranged from 12-12.4% of G&A budgets in 2006 and legal expenses ranged from 3.8% of G&A for private software companies (median revenues of $25M) to over 11% of G&A for profitable, public companies (median revenues of $85M).
Lauren J. Kelley is CEO and founder of OPEXengine. She founded OPEXEngine in late 2006 after 20 years as a senior sales and operating executive building rapid growth businesses for technology companies such as Art Technology Group, Borland Software and Compaq Computer. Previously, she was an international economist with the U.S. Department of Commerce's Office of Computers, covering the supercomputer industry. OPEXEngine delivers actionable operating benchmarks to help technology executives grow their businesses profitably.
For more information about participating in OPEXEngine's next confidential benchmarking for software companies with revenues between $10M and $400M, please contact Lauren directly at: 781-891-4149 or lauren@opexengine.com
Tags: G&A expenses, software G&A, software metrics, software finance
Next Post: U.S. Software IPO Update by Ken Bender
Pages: 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13






