Moving to a SaaS Offense
Now is the time for on-premise vendors and SIs to plan a SaaS offensive - or risk losing market share in the long term.
By R "Ray" Wang, Forrester Research
Jul. 14, 2009
SaaS adoption will move beyond the "Tipping Point" in 2009. Enterprise customers are moving to the on-demand model for a variety of applications as concerns about its shortcomings decline.
When it comes to the topic of SaaS, many on-premise vendors appear to be living in denial, hoping that SaaS fails, and creating confusion in the market place to hasten its demise. In reality, these vendors are missing a significant opportunity to grow market share and reposition their companies for future success.
On-premise vendors still see SaaS as a loss leader due to huge ramp up and punishing revenue recognition rules
Most non-SaaS software vendors just want SaaS to go away. A shift to SaaS requires plenty of work with minimal return - not to mention the destruction of the current business model. In conversations with 61 vendors and building off of SaaS evangelist Jeffrey Kaplan's post (July 2, 2009, Seeking Alpha - "From the Vendor's Point of View: Why SaaS Sucks"), vendors who have made this transition or have started the investment put in heavy lifting in these activities must:
Yet, SaaS adoption moves beyond the "Tipping Point" in 2009
However, the confluence of recessionary forces, stalled innovation from many on-premise software vendors, and success of early SaaS pioneers such as SalesForce.com and NetSuite has pushed Software-as-a-Service into the mainstream. Vendors can no longer resist the move to SaaS without negatively impacting their license sales and customer mind share. Additional facts highlight the shift:
Figure 1: Users expect to increase SaaS adoption in 2009

-
When it comes to the topic of SaaS, many on-premise vendors appear to be living in denial, hoping that SaaS fails, and creating confusion in the market place to hasten its demise. In reality, these vendors are missing a significant opportunity to grow market share and reposition their companies for future success.
On-premise vendors still see SaaS as a loss leader due to huge ramp up and punishing revenue recognition rules
Most non-SaaS software vendors just want SaaS to go away. A shift to SaaS requires plenty of work with minimal return - not to mention the destruction of the current business model. In conversations with 61 vendors and building off of SaaS evangelist Jeffrey Kaplan's post (July 2, 2009, Seeking Alpha - "From the Vendor's Point of View: Why SaaS Sucks"), vendors who have made this transition or have started the investment put in heavy lifting in these activities must:
- Re-architect apps
- Find balance between configuration and optimization of SaaS platform
- Design product road map and rollout strategy
- Determine SLAs
- Identify a hosting strategy
- Craft pricing and licensing policies
- Harmonize SaaS pricing with On-premise and other models
- Create go to market strategy
- Alleviate channel conflict with partners, resellers, distributors
Yet, SaaS adoption moves beyond the "Tipping Point" in 2009
However, the confluence of recessionary forces, stalled innovation from many on-premise software vendors, and success of early SaaS pioneers such as SalesForce.com and NetSuite has pushed Software-as-a-Service into the mainstream. Vendors can no longer resist the move to SaaS without negatively impacting their license sales and customer mind share. Additional facts highlight the shift:
- Forrester State of Enterprise Software 2009 survey results confirm significant adoption rates from 2008 to 2009. Of 1,000 IT executives and decision-makers, 24% were interested/considering, 11% implemented or planning to expand, and 5% piloting SaaS solutions (see Figure 1).
Figure 1: Users expect to increase SaaS adoption in 2009

Source: Forrester
-





